The Feminine and Universal Salvation
by Mary E. and Leon J. Podles
The close connection of women with the rest of creation gives
them a desire for universal salvation. Mary's motherhood ratifies and
transcends this natural symbol.
THE PUBLICATION in 1989 of the English translation of Hans Urs von Balthasar's Dare
We Hope That All Men Be Saved? ignited a small controversy among
conservative Catholics. Some critics detected the odor of the heresy
of the apocatastasis, the doctrine that all creatures, including
Satan, will eventually be saved. This heresy, popular among eminent Greek
fathers such as Origen and Gregory of Nyssa, apparently stemmed from the
Greek view of God as total goodness, and of divine punishments as educative.
The view that prevailed in the West was the darker philosophy of Augustine,
which saw the glory of the saved set off like a jewel against the darkness
of the massa damnata, the mass of the damned. It seems to be
a hallmark of orthodoxy in some circles to believe that many are lost.
Any hint that somehow all may be saved is regarded as smacking of Teilhardism,
Modernism, Communism or something equally wicked. Most of us have been
granted no private revelations, and we pray that no one will be lost,
but the ultimate destiny of the universe is hidden in the darkness of
the divine counsels, although there are hints of the divine intentions
in the role of the mother in both nature and Scripture.
Von Balthasar (1905-88) distinguishes his view of the possibility of
salvation of all from the suspect doctrine of universal salvation by saying
that he sees a hope that all will be saved, not a necessity. Von Balthasar
points to the undeniable universalist cast of many sayings in the New Testament: "acquittal
and life for all” (Rom. 5:18); "God has consigned all to
disobedience, that He may have mercy upon all" (Rom. 11:32); "to
unite all things in Him" (Ep. 1:10). The dire warnings of damnation
that are found in the New Testament, von Balthasar sees as precisely warnings,
although they are often cast in the form of seemingly certain statements
about future events. As von Balthasar might have pointed out, it is a characteristic
of Hebrew prophecy that it makes predictions about the future with an unspoken
condition. The book of Jonah is the best example. Jonah did not want to
preach the destruction of Babylon because he suspected that God would relent
and spare the city. God did, and Jonah felt like a fool, and was bitter.
God answered him: "And should not I pity Nineveh, that great city,
in which there are more than 120,000 people who do not know their right
hand from their left, and also much cattle?" (Jonah 4:11). God's threatened
chastisements are like those of a frustrated parent. Pity is deeper than
seeming justice.
A few considerations might clarify the deeper significance of the controversy
surrounding von Balthasar's book. First, the visionaries whom von Balthasar
quotes in support of his view are all women; second, in Eastern Orthodox
spirituality the desire for universal salvation is closely connected with
Mary's motherhood; and finally, the relationship of mother and child lies
at the root of the human yearning for eternity, both as a natural symbol
of the hope for continuity, a linking of hands across the generations,
and an expression of the supernatural hope that all will be well in eternity.
It was probably Adrienne von Speyr's close relationship to von Balthasar
that prompted him to propound the hope that all will be saved. Her mystical
experience of the meaning of Holy Saturday made clear to von Balthasar
the depth of the divine will to save humanity, a will that led Christ to
descend to the dead and to the damned. Julian of Norwich is the best known
Western visionary who expresses a hope for universal salvation, since she
is told by Christ that "all things shall be well," and "thou
shalt see that all manner thing shall be well," as she recounts in The
Revelations of Divine Love. Julian marvels at this
word of Christ because she knows of the eternal damnation of the demons
and unrepentant sinners, but she is reassured by Christ that "what
is impossible to thee is not impossible to me; I shall save my word in
all things—I shall make all things well."
This hope of universal salvation is closely allied to Julian's sense of
the Motherhood of God. This Motherhood is dependent upon the quasi-identification
of God and the church, our Mother. "For God is Holy Church. God is
its ground. God is its substance. God is its teaching." The love of
a mother is one of pity. "Mercy is a property full of pity; it belongeth
to the Motherhood of tender love." It is the pity of God that led Him
to form the church so that He could be a mother to His creatures. "The
mother can give her child to suck of her milk. But our precious Mother Jesus,
He can feed us with Himself, and doth, full courteously and tenderly, with
the Blessed Sacrament, that is the precious food of true life."
JULIAN carefully bases her devotion to the Motherhood of God on her identification
of Christ and the Church. Despite some interpretations of Julian, it is
very doubtful that femininity can be attributed to God in any proper sense
(see "The Emasculation of God," AMERICA, 11/25/89).
Nor is it necessary to find femininity in God to establish the importance
of the feminine. In Western art the breasts of the Virgin are the sign of
her intercession, and are often visually paralleled to the wounds of Christ
in a way that suggests her role as Co-Redemptress. The visual arts of the
Eastern Church, as much as its formal philosophy and its liturgy, express
a deep theology of the hope for universal salvation, a hope that is associated
with the feminine. For instance, the formal elements of the icon known
as the Virgin of Vladimir, express both the unity of the Mother and her
divine Child, and of the viewer with them in prayer. A single linear outline
defines both mother and child; except for His face, the Christ is entirely
contained within His mother's enclosing contour. The repeating rhythm of
their hands directs the viewer's attention upward: her lower hand enfolding
and supporting the child, her upper one gently touching Him and drawing
Him closer; His lower hand, a redaction of hers in small, touches her with
equal gentleness, and His upper hand encircles and holds her neck.
HERE THE WORSHIPER is given pause to contemplate the touch of the child's
cheek to His mother's. His mouth is juxtaposed to hers: in contour and expression,
it is hers in miniature. His eyes look upward into hers; hers turn outward
to the viewer, to the world that suffers in union with her son, and inward
to the supernatural world where all life and suffering is redeemed. To
the pious observer, the icon is more than a theological emblem or philosophical
truth translated into pictorial terms like a rebus, but rather a window
onto a transcendent supernatural realm.
As he looks on the image in prayer, the iconodule unites himself to the
holy pair even as they are united. He is moved to pity by the infinite mercy
of the sorrowing mother, and learns from her what Isaac of Nineveh described
this way: "The heart's burning for all creation, for human beings,
for birds and animals, and for demons and for everything there is. At the
recollection of them and at the sight of them one's eyes gush forth with
tears owing to the force of the compassion that constrains the heart, so
that, as a result of its abundant sense of mercy, the heart shrinks and
cannot bear to hear or examine any harm or small suffering of anything in
creation. For this reason one offers up tears at all times, even for irrational
animals, and for the enemies of truth, and for those who do harm. As a result
of the immense compassion infused in the heart without measure—like God's—one
even does this for reptiles."
The symbolic concept of this meaning of unity in motherhood runs deep in
the art of both East and West, in literature and in the visual arts. The
Swedish novelist, Selma Lagerlof (1858-1940), relates a telling incident
in The Wonderful Adventures of Nils. A marshy lake that provides shelter
for the nests of thousands of water-birds is going to be drained. The small
child of a farmer who had led the drive to drain the marsh wanders off,
and is seemingly drowned in the lake. His mother searches for him and hears
the cry of the birds, which pierces her heart. "But she heard all these
uncountable bird-throngs, which lived along Takern [the lake], send forth
cry upon cry. Several of them followed her wherever she went; others came
rustling past on light wings. All the air was filled with moans and lamentations.
"But the anguish which she herself was suffering opened her heart.
She thought that she was not as far removed from all other living creatures
as people usually think. She understood much better than ever before how
birds fared. They had their constant worries for home and children; they,
as she. There was surely not such a great difference between them and her
as she had heretofore believed."
Philosophically, the concept is simple enough: The unity of the material
creation provides a ground for universal hope. The physical world is a
continuum, and the destinies of all material beings are interwoven. The
most visible expression of this continuity is motherhood. Mater comes
from
materia, not by historical etymology, but by a divine pun, like Eva and Ave.
Because the God whose name is Salvation (Jesus—God saves), entered the world
not by a sudden appearance but through the material process of birth, Mary's
motherhood, already a natural symbol of the hope of universal salvation,
is ratified and taken up as a new symbol. Both in the East and the West,
she bears the titles that speak of the Christians' hope in her: Refuge
of sinners, Mother of God— Quick to Hear, Mother of God—Searcher of the
Lost, Mother of God—Soothe my Sorrows, Mother of God—Sweet Kissing, Mother
of God—Joy of All That Sorrow. In one of the oldest prayers to her, we read "Sub
tuum praesidium confugimus, Sancta Dei Genetrix" ("We fly to your
protection. Holy Mother of God").
This is why abortion has a special horror for Catholics. It is hated not
simply as the killing of a child, but as an attack on the natural symbol
of the unity of the race that gives us any hope we have of security in this
life and in the life to come. In the old creation, which will persist to
the end of the world, Man and Woman, Adam and Eve, husband and wife are
the core of society, and their relationship is the key to the salvation
or destruction of us all. Yet even that relationship already exists for
the sake of children and the society they imply. In the new creation, which
is already present among us, the New Man and the New Woman are Son and Mother,
Christ and Mary. The focus shifts from the relationship of husband and wife
to mother and child. From their cooperation the fruitfulness of the new
creation springs forth. Abortion, therefore, is a symbolic striking at the
very hope for salvation, an attempt to deny the bond of the unity of mother
and child that provides our hope.
We are saved not by our own merits, but by the grace of God that incorporates
us into the Church our Mother. God cannot be a Mother himself, since God
is spirit. But through the people into whom we are born God becomes a mother
to us. "As one whom his mother comforts, so I will comfort you; you
shall be comforted in Jerusalem" (Is. 66:13). God's immanence is expressed
in His indwelling in the church, the tent of the new salvation. In the icons
of Mary as Protectress, she spreads her cloak over all humanity, sheltering
all those born of Eve in her own motherhood. These are symbols, not dogmas;
but symbols can express realities that leave discursive logic tangled in
seeming contradictions.
The material unity of the creation, epitomized and symbolized by motherhood
and by Mary, is a reflection of the divine unity which is somehow peculiarly
associated with the Holy Spirit, the love that unites Father and Son. That
is why Mary is so closely associated with the work of the Spirit in Luke,
and why Leonardo Boff [The Maternal Face of God: The
Feminine and its Religious Expressions, C.B.C. selection in 1987],
in an exaggeration perhaps designed to irritate Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger,
speaks of the hypostatic union of Mary and the Spirit. The Holy Spirit of
compassion is the uncreated expression of infinite love; His created reflex,
Mary and all motherhood, carries the message of the hope that salvation
cannot be simply the isolated destiny of individuals, but the restoration
and transfiguration of not only the human race, but the entire creation.
Published by AMERICA, October, 24, 1990.
|